Skip to content

The .codearbiter/ Directory Reference

.codearbiter/ is codeArbiter’s project-state store: a root-level directory, outside .claude/, so it survives even if the plugin itself is uninstalled. It holds the project’s own record (its spec, task board, decisions, and audit trail), separate from the plugin code that reads and writes it. /ca:init scaffolds it; /ca:create-context (existing codebase) or /ca:decompose (greenfield) populates it. Its presence and content is the plugin’s actual contract with your repo: if you want to know what codeArbiter knows about your project, or what it will do next, this directory is where to look.

Enforcement itself is gated on one file in here: CONTEXT.md. Everything else described below only matters once that file carries arbiter: enabled.

This page documents every stock path the scaffold or a governed lane produces or reads. Some appear when the owning workflow first needs them (plans/decomposition/, .markers/, .provenance/, spikes/, reports/); those lifecycles are noted below.

New scaffolds record narrative context as native HTML knowledge: context/project.html, context/tech-stack.html, context/coding-standards.html, context/security-controls.html and context/code-map.html, plus greenfield decomposition/project.html. CONTEXT.md frontmatter carries context-format: html for them. Repositories scaffolded earlier keep the Markdown documents and .provenance/ records described below until their owner converts them explicitly with knowledge.py convert, agent-recorded content, a mapping from every returned section to saved records or notes, and convert --finish <token> --coverage @checklist.json. In both formats CONTEXT.md owns activation and stage, and the scope blocks in security-controls.md stay the operative migration, CI and deploy configuration.

Project plans are not feature execution plans

Section titled “Project plans are not feature execution plans”

In an HTML-knowledge repository, greenfield decomposition is one native document, decomposition/project.html, whose capability, component, phase and work-item records hold the intended architecture, phased plan and backlog; reconcile reads them by stable record ID. In a Markdown-format repository, greenfield decomposition creates three named Markdown documents: plans/01-architecture-breakdown.md, plans/02-phased-build-plan.md and plans/03-task-backlog.md. They own project architecture, phased delivery and the project backlog. Reconcile consumes their exact filenames. They are not legacy feature pairs to convert to HTML. Brownfield context creation does not manufacture this set.

Feature/sprint specifications and execution plans are a different layer. New full-lane work uses a same-slug typed HTML pair when the installed package has its qualified native capability; existing Markdown pairs remain on their exact legacy path; small-lane work remains inline with its triage record. Review specifications and plans explains the review, progress and recovery boundaries.

PathWritten byRead byEditable by hand?
CONTEXT.md/ca:init; context workflows through the native writerevery enforcement hook (arbiter_active()), the orchestratorNo: use the context writer; preserve activation frontmatter
code-map.mdContext workflows through the native writerfeature/task orientation, context checksNo: refresh selected claims through /ca:context-check
context/*.htmlHTML-format context workflows through knowledge.py and the native engineknowledge.py relevant, task-context, reviewersNo: change records with knowledge.py; a Git conflict uses knowledge.py merge-conflict
decomposition/project.htmlHTML-format /ca:decomposeInterview resume, reconcile, knowledge.py promoteNo: change records with knowledge.py
.gitattributes/ca:init (HTML format) and knowledge.py convert --finishGitKeep it: it stops line-ending conversion of native HTML artifacts
open-tasks.md/ca:task only/ca:status, the statusline, SessionStartNo: guarded to /ca:task (hook H-22, helper-only)
done-tasks.md/ca:task archive, /ca:standup’s per-item archival sweepthe permanent record; read on demandNo: guarded (hook H-22, append-only)
open-questions.mdthe orchestrator, when a [CONFIRM-NN] is raised/ca:status, SessionStart, the statuslineYes
decisions/*.md, decision-log.md/ca:adr only/ca:adr-status, /ca:reconcile, post-write-edit.py (H-12)No: guarded to /ca:adr
specs/*.mdLegacy feature/sprint workflows already owned by Markdownwriting-plans, /ca:statusYes
plans/01-architecture-breakdown.md, 02-phased-build-plan.md, 03-task-backlog.mdGreenfield decomposeHuman project review, reconcileReview through the owning project-planning procedure; preserve exact filenames
Other legacy plans/*.mdwriting-plans for an existing Markdown specexecuting-plans, subagent-driven-development, /ca:statusPreserve the selected format, agreed scope and execution state
specs/*.html, plans/*.htmlNew full-lane feature/sprint workflows through the internal typed-artifact engine (default)The same workflow readers through validated, scoped readsNo: use typed engine operations
plans/decomposition//ca:decomposeInterview resume and context provenancePreserve the recorded answers and decisions through the owning workflow
checkpoints/*.mdcheckpoint-aggregator agent (/ca:checkpoint)/ca:audit, /ca:status-adjacent readsYes
audits/*.md/ca:audithumans (report only)Yes
reports//ca:tribunal and named handoff/evidence workflowsthe owning workflow on resume, humansYes, but not while an owning run is in flight
sprint-log.md/ca:sprint/ca:status, /ca:auditNo: append-only, guarded (H-05)
overrides.log/ca:override, the mode-plane flip (mode --dangerous/--ops/--arbiter, MODE: <name> enter/exit)statusline, /ca:status, /ca:audit, staleness-warnNo: append-only, guarded (H-05)
triage.log/ca:feature small-lane triage/ca:auditNo: append-only, guarded (H-05)
gate-events.logevery block()/remind()/warn() call in the hooks(durable sink; no reader ships yet)No: append-only, guarded (H-05)
.markers/security-pass.py, migration-pass.py, prompt-submit.py (mode marker), /ca:adrthe commit-gate hooks (pre-bash.py, pre-write.py, pre-edit.py)No: guarded, and hand-writing one is friction and an audit trail, not a proof (see below)
.provenance/*.jsoncontext-creation, decompose, context-check (re-scout/re-baseline)SessionStart (drift line), commit-gate (auto-heal)Not by hand: regenerate via /ca:context-check
security-controls.md, tech-stack.md, coding-standards.mdContext workflows through the native writerreviewer agents, the crypto/secret gatesNo: update selected content with its paired provenance
last-checkpoint/ca:checkpoint after its report is written/ca:status, the statusline (overrides-since-checkpoint)Not normally: it’s a counter, not a note
spikes/*.md/ca:spikehumans, /ca:feature (seeds brainstorming)Yes

The activation contract. Its leading YAML frontmatter carries two load-bearing keys:

  • arbiter: enabled — the single flag every enforcement hook checks via arbiter_active() (plugins/ca/hooks/_hooklib.py). It must appear inside a properly closed frontmatter block: --- opens on line 1, arbiter: enabled somewhere inside, --- closes it. A block that opens but never closes is treated as malformed, not disabled, and is surfaced as an error rather than silently ignored. A file with no frontmatter at all is simply dormant. Missing activation is dormant. Malformed activation is a separate error state; do not treat it as a documented way to disable enforcement.
  • context-format: html — present in HTML-knowledge repositories; selects where narrative context lives. Absent means the Markdown documents.
  • stage: N — a single maturity number that /ca:status and the statusline surface. It has no enforcement effect encoded in this file itself; it is a legible signal for how far the project has matured, not a config switch.

The body needs an <!--INITIALIZED--> marker before the file counts as populated. SessionStart checks for it: present with source code in the repo but the marker absent routes to /ca:create-context; absent with no source routes to /ca:decompose. Once the marker and frontmatter are both in place, the orchestrator persona loads on every session in this repo.

Activation classification flow: a missing CONTEXT.md or missing leading frontmatter is dormant; an unclosed block is malformed and surfaces an error; a closed block containing arbiter enabled activates the persona and gates.
`CONTEXT.md` is classified on each activation check; the file does not carry hidden activation state.

Writers: /ca:init (scaffold), /ca:decompose and /ca:create-context (populate + lock). Readers: every enforcement hook, the SessionStart injector, the statusline. Editable by hand? No. Context changes use native preview/apply with paired provenance; the protected writer preserves activation frontmatter and the initialization marker. Delete it: codeArbiter goes fully dormant in this repo on the next session (no persona, no enforcement, nothing loads). The rest of .codearbiter/ is untouched on disk; recreating CONTEXT.md (or running /ca:init again) reactivates it against whatever state remains.

A source-backed orientation map from repository concerns to paths and roles. Context creation or decomposition writes it after inspecting the codebase; feature and planning lanes read it when present so task discovery begins from known seams instead of a whole-tree search.

The map is not an access-control list. Its claims carry provenance and can become stale when source paths move. /ca:context-check reports that drift and offers re-scout, re-baseline, or defer.

Writers: /ca:create-context, /ca:decompose, and provenance auto-heal. Readers: feature/task planning and context-check flows. Editable by hand? No. Update selected claims and their provenance through the native writer. Delete it: governed lanes fall back to repository discovery; enforcement remains active.

The board: one top-level - bullet per task, in one of three states: queued (- [ ]), in-progress (- [~], always carrying a started date), or done (- [x]). The only sanctioned writer is /ca:task (add / start / done), which calls the pure _taskboardlib transforms via taskwrite.py so every entry stays schema-conformant and every transition dated. Hand-editing risked malforming the schema, which is why the command exists. A task’s [x] done-flip, [~] start-flip, or new [ ] entry rides the work commit itself through commit-gate (ADR-0008); there’s no separate lagging board-only PR.

Writers: /ca:task only. Readers: /ca:status, the statusline, SessionStart (in-flight count and staleness). Editable by hand? No: guarded to the one writer, and that guard is now enforced rather than advisory. The file is enrolled in the protected-state registry as helper-only (hook H-22), so a hand-rolled Write, Edit, shell redirect, write verb, or interpreter one-liner naming it is refused across all three flanks. Reading it is untouched. Delete it: the board is empty going forward; nothing else breaks, but every count that reads it (statusline, /ca:status) reports zero until tasks are re-added.

The permanent record of archived work. /ca:task archive (and /ca:standup’s per-item archival sweep) moves a long-done task here so the board keeps reporting current work rather than history. An in-flight count that includes tasks finished three months ago stops meaning anything.

Enrolled in the protected-state registry as append-only (hook H-22): a completed task has exactly one permanent record, so the file grows and is never rewritten in place. The archive verb writes here before removing from open-tasks.md, so an interrupted sweep leaves a duplicate the next run absorbs rather than a lost record, and it refuses outright if this file exists but cannot be read, because rewriting an unreadable archive would discard everything already in it.

Created on first archive; an existing repository won’t have one until then.

Writers: /ca:task archive only. Readers: on demand; nothing computes a count from it. Editable by hand? No: guarded, append-only. Delete it: the archived history is gone and unrecoverable except through git. Nothing operational breaks, since the next archive recreates it, but the record it existed to make permanent is lost, which is the one outcome its policy is designed to prevent.

The record of unresolved [CONFIRM-NN] items: numbered placeholders for a question only the user can answer, per the terminology lock in arbiter.md §0.1. An open CONFIRM-NN blocks the dependent work until it is resolved; it is never guessed at or resolved inside an ADR. The SessionStart hook and the statusline both count occurrences here.

Writers: the orchestrator, when a skill surfaces a genuine unknown. Readers: /ca:status, SessionStart, the statusline. Editable by hand? Yes: resolving a CONFIRM-NN is a prose edit recording the decision and its date. Delete it: any [CONFIRM-NN] count in the statusline or /ca:status reads zero; a future skill that needs to raise one recreates the file.

One numbered, dated, user-attributed file per Architecture Decision Record (0001-*.md, 0002-*.md, …), plus decision-log.md, an append-only ledger that mirrors every ADR as one entry. /ca:adr is the only sanctioned author; both the shell flank (redirects, cp, sed -i targeting decisions/) and the Write/Edit flank are guarded (H-11) so an ADR can’t be fabricated, edited after the fact, or slipped in outside the command. Status moves through proposed -> accepted -> superseded | rejected; a superseding decision never rewrites the prior file. It appends a new numbered ADR whose own text names what it supersedes, and a new decision-log.md entry does the same.

Writers: /ca:adr (via the decision-lifecycle skill) only. Readers: /ca:adr-status, /ca:reconcile, and post-write-edit.py’s H-12 advisory (a file matching an ADR’s governs: glob gets a reminder on every future touch). Editable by hand? No: guarded. Delete it: the project’s decision history is gone; governs: reminders for any ADR that used to cover a file stop firing, and /ca:adr-status has nothing to report.

One canonical feature specification maintained by brainstorming under the user’s existing authorization. It captures the intended outcome, criteria and unresolved decisions. New full-lane workflows use typed .html; existing Markdown pairs retain their representation. writing-plans derives tasks from the specification, and /ca:status reports actual progress and verification without treating draft status as a permission gate.

Writers: brainstorming. Readers: writing-plans, /ca:status. Editable by hand? Markdown only. Use typed engine operations for HTML so its model and view remain one authority. Delete it: the governing requirements are lost. A plan binds to its specification, so a missing specification cannot be treated as a self-contained plan. Preserve remaining files and recover known bytes through version control or the recorded transaction. A legacy plan’s text may remain readable, but that is not proof that the lost spec can be reconstructed. Do not restart the pair in a different format.

In addition to the three exact greenfield project documents described above, this directory contains one same-format file per feature’s execution plan, derived by writing-plans from its specification. New full-lane plans use typed .html; existing Markdown specs continue to matching .md plans. Each task carries an exact file path and a verification step that maps to a tdd obligation. executing-plans and subagent-driven-development consume it task by task; /ca:status reports implementation completion and verification separately, retaining DONE and historical ACCEPTED labels.

Writers: writing-plans. Readers: executing-plans, subagent-driven-development, /ca:status. Editable by hand? Markdown only; HTML uses typed engine operations. Editing a legacy plan mid-execution risks desyncing it from tasks already marked accepted. Delete it: an in-progress feature loses its resumption point; /ca:status can no longer report that pipeline’s progress.

New full-lane specifications and plans use a structured HTML format. It is an internal leaf of the existing feature and sprint workflows, not another public command or agent surface. Each file contains an authoritative typed JSON model and a deterministic visible view, so it can be reviewed offline in a browser without JavaScript or network access. Engine reads validate the model, hashes, local resources, symbol markers and visible view together; opening the file does not approve or mutate it.

The workflow checks its installation-owned, manifest-verified native payload before writing and fails closed without it; it never falls back to a new Markdown artifact. Existing Markdown pairs remain authoritative in their exact format, with no automatic migration. HTML farm use has a separate unclosed qualification bar and remains disabled. Explicit conversion always handles a spec and plan together, creates drafts, transfers no old approvals, and retains exact legacy bytes for guarded rollback. See the repository guidance for the format and migration/recovery contracts.

Writers: the existing feature/sprint coordinator through the installed, manifest-verified engine. Readers: those same workflows through indexed and contextual engine reads; humans through an offline browser. Editable by hand? No. Use typed operations so revisions, stable IDs, hashes and recovery records remain coherent. Delete it: a governing typed artifact is lost; recover it from version control or the recorded transaction rather than silently restarting as Markdown.

Durable source evidence for the greenfield interview. _session.md records the active phase, remaining questions and actual confirmations; layer files retain answers, trade-offs and unresolved decisions. Resume from the first unfinished step without repeating settled questions.

Context documents cite these retained files. Keep them after initialization so provenance still resolves. Finalization checks the required project outputs and all five document/provenance pairs.

Writers/readers: /ca:decompose only. Editable by hand? No useful reason; resume through the command. Delete it: interview history and cited provenance sources are lost. Recover known bytes before resuming dependent work.

One dated report per /ca:checkpoint sweep (YYYY-MM-DD.md), written by the checkpoint-aggregator agent from the finding-triage and decision-challenger output. Findings are classified by severity; the ones blocking the current change are called out, the rest recorded for later. /ca:tribunal’s deep-audit output is a distinct artifact (reports/<run-id>/, below). Reports retain the review-start UTC time, full source commit and dirty-tree observation so an audit can resolve its window. The separate last-checkpoint file remains an override counter.

Writers: checkpoint-aggregator. Readers: humans (the report is the deliverable); /ca:audit pulls still-open findings from the most recent one. Editable by hand? Yes, though there’s rarely reason to. Delete it: history of past sweeps is gone; the next /ca:checkpoint recreates the directory and writes fresh.

One dated governance packet per /ca:audit run (YYYY-MM-DD.md), assembling commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, and open checkpoint findings for a given range into one document. /ca:audit is read-only against everything it summarizes: it never mutates overrides.log, decisions/, or any of its other sources.

Writers: /ca:audit. Readers: humans. Editable by hand? Yes. Delete it: past audit packets are gone; nothing else in the framework depends on their presence, since /ca:audit re-derives everything from the underlying logs and files each run.

Durable evidence and handoff material owned by a named workflow. Tribunal uses .codearbiter/reports/<run-id>/, where <run-id> is <UTC-date>-<scope-slug>. A fresh run opens run.jsonl; a resumed run reuses the same ID. Findings are written one file at a time with append-only triage/run logs so an interruption resumes from disk.

Other governed campaigns may write a clearly named report or handoff directory here. The owning spec or plan defines its schema; the directory is not an unstructured dumping ground.

Writers: the owning governed workflow. Readers: that workflow on resume and humans reviewing its evidence. Editable by hand? Not while an owning run is active. Delete it: an in-flight workflow may lose its resumption record; completed evidence disappears. Filed GitHub issues, if any, are unaffected.

The append-only ledger of every SMARTS-scored auto-decision an autonomous /ca:sprint makes on a non-hard-gate point, each entry carrying a confidence flag (low entries are the ones worth reviewing after the fact). Hard gates (security controls, auth/crypto/secrets, irreversible operations, an unresolved [CONFIRM-NN], a merge to default) are never auto-decided and never appear here as a resolved decision; they stop and surface to the user instead.

Writers: /ca:sprint. Readers: /ca:status, /ca:audit, the staleness-warn check (a sprint marked active for over 30 minutes with no matching log activity gets a WARN). Editable by hand? No. One of the four append-only audit logs (H-05): a shell truncation/ rewrite aimed at it is blocked, and a Write/Edit must be a verifiable tail-anchored append, never an overwrite or an empty-old_string edit passed off as one. Delete it: the sprint decision trail for past runs is gone; a /ca:sprint in progress that depended on it for staleness-warn context loses that signal, though the sprint itself can still recreate the file on its next append.

The append-only, permanent audit trail of every /ca:override bypass and every mode-plane transition (mode --dangerous/--ops, a deterministic whole-prompt token flip, never a command).

Two row formats share this file. Do not read one as the other.

Override rowMode-transition row
Format[ISO-8601] | BY: <name> <<email>> | GATE: <gate bypassed> | REASON: <reason>[ISO-8601] | BY: session-mode | HOST: <host> | SESSION: <id> | MODE: <name> enter|exit | NOTE: —
Identitythe operator, from git config user.email; if unset the user is asked once rather than recording an empty BY:the literal session-mode, because a mode flip is a posture change by the session and not an act attributed to a person
FieldsGATE and REASONHOST, SESSION and MODE; no GATE, no REASON

The SESSION field is load-bearing, not decoration: an enter row is what authorizes a gates-off marker to take effect, so it is matched per session. Without it one session’s row would authorize another session’s marker. Rows written before the field existed authorize no session and resolve to arbiter.

A MODE: row is therefore not a user-attributed override, and counting the two together overstates how often a human bypassed a gate. Readers accept legacy DEV: rows too, since existing history is append-only and never rewritten. The statusline counts entries newer than the last-checkpoint marker as “overrides since last checkpoint.”

Writers: /ca:override, the mode-plane flip (prompt-submit.py, MODE: entry/exit lines). Readers: statusline, /ca:status, /ca:audit, the CONFIRM-09 staleness-warn check. Editable by hand? No. H-05 guarded, same as sprint-log.md: append-only, tail-anchored edits only, no truncation or rewrite. Delete it: the entire override history is gone (a genuine loss, since this is the one mechanical record that a bypass happened at all). codeArbiter keeps functioning; the audit trail does not recover.

The append-only record of every small-lane classification /ca:feature makes (the SMARTS reasoning behind routing a change to the lighter lane instead of the full spec-to-plan pipeline).

Writers: /ca:feature (small-lane triage step). Readers: /ca:audit. Editable by hand? No: H-05 guarded, same append-only contract as the other three logs. Delete it: the small-lane classification history is gone, and /ca:audit has nothing to report for that period.

Every block(), remind(), and warn() call in the hooks appends one line to this durable, mechanical sink. Format: [ISO-8601Z] KIND [tag] host=<host> hook=<script> | msg. Before this log existed, a gate decision was visible only in the ephemeral per-turn stderr transcript; this makes every BLOCK, REMIND, and WARN durable and queryable after the fact. The write is fail-open by contract: a missing .codearbiter/ directory or an unwritable log file is swallowed silently rather than changing the calling hook’s exit code. This sink must never itself cause a gate to misbehave.

Writers: every hook, via the shared _log_gate_event() helper in _hooklib.py. Readers: none ship yet as of this writing. It’s a durable record for manual inspection or a future consumer. Editable by hand? No: H-05 guarded, same append-only contract. Delete it: past gate decisions are gone from the durable record; hooks keep blocking/reminding exactly as before (the log is a side effect of a gate decision, never a precondition for one), and a fresh file is created on the next event.

Gate-pass tokens and short-lived UI flags, created on demand. This directory doesn’t exist until the first marker-writing action runs. The load-bearing ones:

  • security-gate-passed — written by security-pass.py on a genuine crypto-compliance or secret-handling PASS. It contains a SHA-256 digest of every sensitive added line it approved, not just an empty touch. The commit-time gates (H-09b for crypto/TLS, H-10b for secrets) block a commit unless this marker exists and covers every sensitive line in the current staged diff. There is no time window: a pass stays valid for exactly the lines it reviewed, in the files it reviewed them in, so a pass recorded for one diff can’t launder a later, different change or a reviewed line moved to another file.
  • migration-gate-passed — the same digest-binding contract, for the H-14 migration-review gate, written by migration-pass.py against a migration file’s current content.
  • mode — a gitignored file holding the session’s current posture (arbiter, dangerous, or ops), session-keyed, written by the deterministic mode --dangerous/--ops/--arbiter token flip and cleared at SessionStart. Absent, empty, unreadable, or unrecognized resolves to arbiter. Drives the statusline’s red-shift in dangerous; not itself gate-bearing. No enforcement hook reads it, only the persona composed at each turn does.
  • adr-authoring-active — touched by /ca:adr while an ADR authoring session is open; the one marker a command other than the security-pass helpers legitimately writes directly.

Writers: security-pass.py, migration-pass.py, prompt-submit.py (mode marker), /ca:adr. Readers: the commit-gate hooks (pre-bash.py) that check security-gate-passed and migration-gate-passed before allowing a git commit. Editable by hand? No: pre-write.py/pre-edit.py block Write/Edit targeting this directory (issue #160), and pre-bash.py’s H-19 flank blocks the shell forge spellings too (cp/mv/tee/ sed/a redirect, and an interpreter one-liner such as python -c "open(...).write(...)"). These flanks add real friction and leave an audit trail on the cooperative-agent path (ADR-0010). They are not a proof. The marker is a cooperative attestation: security-pass.py/migration-pass.py re-derive digests from a public, pure function of the file content the forger already holds, so no digest scheme can make the marker unforgeable to a determined same-user process willing to reproduce that computation outside the sanctioned producer. Its value is the friction and the record it leaves, not unforgeability. Delete it: every commit-time crypto/secret/migration gate reverts to its unpassed state. The next sensitive commit blocks until the corresponding gate runs again and re-records a pass. No enforcement is weakened; you just lose the standing “already checked” credit.

One v2 JSON record for each of CONTEXT, code-map, tech-stack, coding-standards and security-controls, written atomically with its Markdown document. Records bind exact document bytes and the source evidence for their claims using declared digest methods, including raw SHA-256 for content. Coverage, identity freshness and semantic review remain distinct results. SessionStart reports missing or stale evidence; /ca:context-check audits it and refreshes explicitly selected documents through native preview/apply.

Writers: context-creation, decompose, and context-check’s re-scout/re-baseline actions. Readers: SessionStart (the drift line), commit-gate (auto-heal worklist). Editable by hand? No. Use the paired context writer. Delete it: coverage becomes incomplete; the missing record does not establish current or semantically verified context.

/ca:init creates the activation file, open boards, override log, and checkpoint counter. It then routes an existing codebase to /ca:create-context or a greenfield repository to /ca:decompose. Those context-building flows produce security-controls.md, tech-stack.md, and coding-standards.md. These living references are maintained with paired provenance through the native writer and read by reviewer agents (security-controls.md especially: the crypto-compliance and secret-handling gates read it before every review, and it’s level 1 in the conflict hierarchy). last-checkpoint is a one-line counter (the override count at the time of the last /ca:checkpoint) that the statusline and /ca:status use to compute “overrides since last checkpoint.” It’s a counter, not a note, so there’s rarely reason to hand-edit it. spikes/ holds one findings file per /ca:spike (the question asked, what was tried, the answer, and what it implies), written on exit, since spike code itself is disposable and never merges.